in the fight against the censorship of Americans, Brighten Media, a media company known for its conservative viewpoints, has filed a lawsuit against Big Tech companies alleging censorship and bias in the way their content is hidden on various online platforms. The lawsuit raises important questions about the power that tech giants have to control the flow of information and the potential impact on free speech and democracy.

Censorship of Americans: Arguments

One of the main arguments put forth by Brighten Media in its lawsuit is that Big Tech companies have a monopoly on online visibility and use their power to silence American conservative voices. The company argues that its content has been unfairly targeted and censored by algorithms and content moderation policies that are biased against conservative viewpoints. For example, Brighten Media claims that its posts have been labeled as “fake news” or “hate speech” without proper justification, leading to a suppression of its reach and influence on social media.

Censorship of Americans: Suppress Conservative Voices

Furthermore, the lawsuit alleges that Big Tech companies have colluded to suppress conservative voices and promote a liberal agenda. Brighten Media points to instances where its content was removed or demonetized on multiple platforms such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc. simultaneously. Suggesting a coordinated effort to silence dissenting opinions raises concerns about the lack of transparency and accountability in how content moderation decisions are made and the potential for abuse by tech companies with ideological biases.

Named in the Lawsuit:

• Google
• Facebook
• Twitter
• Department of Defense
• Department of Homeland Security

Speech Controlled by A Few

The lawsuit also highlights the broader implications of censorship by Big Tech companies for free speech and democracy. As more and more of our public discourse takes place online, the ability of a few powerful companies to control what information is seen and shared has significant consequences for the health of our democracy. Censorship can stifle debate, limit the diversity of voices in the public sphere, and undermine the marketplace of ideas that is essential for a functioning democracy.

My Conclusion:

The bible mentions “wicked rulers” in high places of government. (Ephesians 6:10-18) These government agencies get their orders directly from the god of this world, Satan. (2 Corinthians 4:4)

With that in mind, any attempt to expose Satan and his evil devices such as silencing the true modern day prophets who use social media and other online tools to declare the gospel of the end times will be met with algorithms that moderate by redacting the truth. We must pray that this lawsuit wins and hopefully hold back the waters of Big Tech and government until we can tell the truth no more!